[PATCH][x86] Enable broadwell march to llvm/clang

Eric Christopher echristo at gmail.com
Thu Sep 18 10:13:31 PDT 2014


Cool, a comment to that effect in the code would probably be nice.

Otherwise LGTM.

-eric

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Robert Khasanov <rob.khasanov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Difference between two sets of builtins that _addcarryx can be used only
> if ADX feature available. Whereas _addcarry and _subborrow can be used w/o
> ADX CPUID.
> That's why I included "#ifdef __ADX__" line inside adxintrin.h, put
> _addcarryx intrinsics under #ifdef and other outside #ifdef, finally
> divided into two patches.
>
>
> 2014-09-17 21:34 GMT+04:00 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>:
>
>>
>> +#include <adxintrin.h>
>> +
>>
>> #ifdef __ADX__ ?
>>
>> And any reason the two sets of builtins aren't in the same patch or were
>> you planning on one large commit for this?
>>
>> -eric
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Clang patches LGTM with some tweaks.
>>>
>>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -target-feature +adx
>>> -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
>>> +
>>> +// Don't include mm_malloc.h, it's system specific.
>>> +#define __MM_MALLOC_H
>>>
>>> You can use the -ffreestanding flag to avoid this quirk, I believe.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Robert Khasanov <rob.khasanov at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ping
>>>> Could anyone review clang patches?
>>>>
>>>> 2014-08-25 15:58 GMT+04:00 Robert Khasanov <rob.khasanov at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Ping
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-08-21 13:53 GMT+04:00 Robert Khasanov <rob.khasanov at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for review, Nadav!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Committed rev216161, 216162, 216163, 216164.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could anyone review clang patches?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-08-20 20:41 GMT+04:00 Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The LLVM patches LGTM.  Thanks Robert!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Aug 20, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Robert Khasanov <
>>>>>>> rob.khasanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > These patches enable Broadwell subtarget:
>>>>>>> > Broadwell ISA includes Haswell ISA + ADX + RDSEED + SMAP
>>>>>>> > New instructions were already enabled. These patches define
>>>>>>> broadwell cpu, SMAP Feature and add intrinsics to LLVM/clang
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> <001_llvm_broadwell_target.patch><002_llvm_adox_adcx.patch><003_llvm_smap.patch><004_llvm_adc_sbb.patch><005_clang_broadwell_target.patch><006_clang_adx.patch><007_clang_adc_sbb.patch>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140918/532348d6/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list