[PATCH] gcc compatibility: silent -finline-limit=1234 & -finline-limit

[Arthur Marble]

Hello,

That makes sense to me for other flags but in this case isn't clang not
planning to support inline functions? If it is not then should we have the
compiler spit out a message about how this is not used?

Regards,
Arthur


On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:

> Patch?
>
> I investigated this flag too a while back and reached the conclusion it's
> only interesting to support if we actually hook it into the backend.
>
> Otherwise it's unfair to users to silently claim support for an option
> that has semantic significance, only to go and ignore it. Especially if
> it's only to unblock a dozen packages it'd be a shame.
>
> On the plus side, it was really rewarding to implement a GCC-compatible
> -Wframe-larger-than= a few weeks ago so I *do* think there's value in
> providing real implementations of these flags because it informs decisions
> we need to make about backend/frontend layering.
>
> Alp.
>
>
> On 04/07/2014 18:15, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>
>> adding cfe-commits
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4376
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>
> --
> http://www.nuanti.com
> the browser experts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140704/8de5f9df/attachment.html>