[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
chisophugis at gmail.com
Tue Jul 1 10:57:57 PDT 2014
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> Alp noted that the current setup on how phab reviews land on the list are
> not working for him. I'd be curious whether his setup is special, or
> whether there are more widespread problems. If this is more widely
> perceived as a problem, please speak up, and I'll make sure to prioritize
> the fixes (note that this is unrelated to the "lost email" problem - those
> are always highest priority and as far as I'm aware we diagnosed and fixed
> all of them within 1-2 business days).
> If you have the feeling that the phab email workflow makes it hard for you
> to jump into reviews, keep track of reviews, or understand reviews if
> you're not a phab user, please reply to this thread. You don't need to
> provide details, "+1", "please fix", or "doesn't work well for me" are all
> acceptable replies here - I want to get a feeling for the magnitude of the
My biggest issue is with email replies not getting into the webui (or
getting horribly mangled by being interpreted as "phab markdown").
A minor nuisance is that after replying on phab I get an email of what I
just wrote, which is sort of useless.
-- Sean Silva
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-commits