[patch] Drop support for non-cfi capable assemblers

[Rafael Espíndola]

ping

On 26 March 2014 20:17, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 March 2014 23:21, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler
>> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we
>> care overly much about.
>
> The make the proposal more concrete, is the attached clang patch OK?
>
> It removes support from the clang side. If that is OK, we can wait a
> couple of weeks before removing the support from the llvm side.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael