[LLVMdev] 3.4.1 Release Plans

[Tim Northover]

> OK, I know Tim has replied to this thread, but I just want to make sure
> there are no surprises.

I am watching, and broadly support the inclusion of the NEON
improvements (and the mangling one myself -- Clang 3.4 was broken and
in ABI violation in that respect, I don't like providing compatibility
with broken).

But I definitely wouldn't press for any special ABI consideration to
be granted to us at the LLVM level. I was also waiting for some
general consensus on the ABI issue before weighing in.

Cheers.

Tim.