[libcxx] r204653 - Mark LWG Issue #2288 as complete. This was wording cleanup, no code changes required.

[Marshall Clow]

Author: marshall
Date: Mon Mar 24 13:38:01 2014
New Revision: 204653

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=204653&view=rev
Log:
Mark LWG Issue #2288 as complete. This was wording cleanup, no code changes required.
Also mark #2104 as complete. Leave the implementation in libc++ as noexcept, since 
implementations are allowed to add noexcept to non-virtual calls. If we throw from
unique_lock& operator=(unique_lock&& u), then that means the preconditions were violated,
and calling terminate() (as a result of throwing from a noexcept function) is as
good example of undefined behavior as any other.

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html?rev=204653&r1=204652&r2=204653&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html Mon Mar 24 13:38:01 2014
@@ -265,14 +265,14 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2357">2357</a></td><td>Remaining "Assignable" requirement</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2359">2359</a></td><td>How does regex_constants::nosubs affect basic_regex::mark_count()?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2360">2360</a></td><td>reverse_iterator::operator*() is unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104">2104</a></td><td>unique_lock move-assignment should not be noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104">2104</a></td><td>unique_lock move-assignment should not be noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2186">2186</a></td><td>Incomplete action on async/launch::deferred</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075">2075</a></td><td>Progress guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288">2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288">2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <!-- 	<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> -->
   </table>
 
-  <p>Last Updated: 07-Mar-2014</p>
+  <p>Last Updated: 24-Mar-2014</p>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>