OK to merge r203025 to 3.4 branch?

[Richard Smith]

Approved.


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> Is it OK to merge the following commit to the 3.4 branch, which fixes:
> http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19010
>
> r203025 | richard-llvm | 2014-03-05 15:32:50 -0800 (Wed, 05 Mar 2014) |
> 3 lines
>
> PR19010: Make sure we initialize (empty) indirect base class subobjects
> when
> evaluating trivial default initialization of a literal class type.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140313/e9825840/attachment.html>