OK to merge r203025 to 3.4 branch?

[Tom Stellard]

Hi Richard,

Is it OK to merge the following commit to the 3.4 branch, which fixes:
http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19010

r203025 | richard-llvm | 2014-03-05 15:32:50 -0800 (Wed, 05 Mar 2014) |
3 lines

PR19010: Make sure we initialize (empty) indirect base class subobjects
when
evaluating trivial default initialization of a literal class type.

Thanks,
Tom