[PATCH] Slightly better handling of transparent_union attribute

[Richard Smith]

LGTM, thanks!

On Mon Jan 27 2014 at 5:46:11 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
wrote:

> This patch addresses PR15134; we were being too strict with our
> checking of alignments for transparent union members. This patch
> relaxes the alignment checking rules by only enforcing the diagnostic
> when subsequent alignments are more strict than the original
> alignment.
>
> I've also added a FIXME to the code to describe at least one of the
> ways we're not handling the attribute semantics quite right.
>
> ~Aaron
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140128/15b05886/attachment.html>