[PATCH] Test that an ObjC property of type void at least doesn't crash

[Jordan Rose]

Is this even meaningful? Should we at least warn on a void property?

On Jan 13, 2014, at 2:23 , Scott Talbot <s at chikachow.org> wrote:

> Since LLVM r187963, clang has crashed when producing DWARF debug info for an ObjC property of type void.
> This testcase simply checks that that doesn't happen, I have a fix for LLVM separate to this.
> 
> -Scott
> 
> ---
> test/CodeGenObjC/property-type-void.m | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 test/CodeGenObjC/property-type-void.m
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Test-that-an-ObjC-property-of-type-void-at-least-doe.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 416 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140113/484d6b50/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits