[patch] Add missing license headers to libc++

[Daniel Berlin]

I'm completely indifferent about this.  Legally, the worst that could
happen is someone could take the tests and use them and claim they didn't
know they were copyrighted or licensed.  They'd probably lose anyway, but
they could at least claim that if their is no notice.
The question, which i offer no real opinion on, is "do we care if that
happens".

For tests, I usually have a really hard time working up any desire to care
enough to tell people to be checking headers.





On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:

> Adding Danny as he may be able to clarify...
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>wrote:
>
>> On a related subject, what's the policy regarding the LIT tests? None of
>> them has the license headers, but they are source code, too, and are
>> presumably distributed under the same licenses.
>> On Dec 26, 2013 9:49 PM, "Nico Weber" <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we noticed that a handful of files in libc++ are missing license headers
>>> (mostly test files, and some files added for the solaris port). The
>>> attached patch adds them. Ok?
>>>
>>> Fixes PR18291.
>>>
>>> Nico
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131226/25fb4268/attachment.html>