[PATCH] Added LanguageStandard::LS_JavaScript to gate all JS-specific parsing.

[Manuel Klimek]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Daniel Jasper <djasper at google.com> wrote:

> I think JS and C++ will almost always be in different sub-directories. So
> different .clang-format files are the way to go..
>

That would be an argument for putting it in as a style option, right?


>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Jasper <djasper at google.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>   After thinking some more, I guess my main reason is that I strongly
>>> doubt
>>>   that we'll ever have a JavaScript style and a C++ style that are
>>> identical
>>>   in all aspects other than the LanguageStandard.. So, the detection
>>> based on
>>>   the file extension inside clang-format will likely be redundant..
>>>
>>
>> I think this would be useful for mixed open source projects (or companies
>> without an existing style guide).
>>  One interesting point is that our configuration is very "repo" centric,
>> and there are enough mixed repos out there - how would we want to support
>> this without major setup effort required for every engineer contributing to
>> a project...
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131121/04eeff00/attachment.html>