r194403 - Using an invalid -O falls back on -O3 instead of an error

[Sylvestre Ledru]

On 11/11/2013 22:06, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>
>     Can you please explain further?
>
>
> Sorry if I'm still being vague. It's vague. This is based on my
> experience both benchmarking lots of my own software (personal and at
> work) and based on listening to lots of others doing the same. I think
> this is somewhat OK because we're just trying to pick a "default" or a
> "fallback". I just don't think -O3 is the most sensible.
>
-O2 then ? :)

Sylvestre

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131111/531c4116/attachment.html>