[llvm] r193350 - Reverting my r193344 checkin due to build breakage.

[Chandler Carruth]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <kyrtzidis at apple.com>wrote:

> It looks like the failure was in clang-tools-extra (
> http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangTools.html).
> IMHO, since this is not in the clang repository, it is unreasonable to
> have the phase1 bots tied to that and expect everyone to build and update
> it after making changes.
>
> Michael, what do you think ? I think we *should* have a bot
> building clang-tools-extra, but I don't think it belongs in phase 1.
>

I don't care very much whether its in phase 1, but I think it is really,
really important that developers making an API change are expected to
update code in that tree.

When changing an LLVM API, we routinely ask people to update Clang,
DragonEgg, etc. This shouldn't be any different.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131024/d342ffed/attachment.html>