[libcxx] r191142 - Apply LWG 2048. It is amazing to me that this actually works, but the existing tests confirm that it does. c++1y status page now showing libc++ is complete for c++1y modulo dynarray issues.
howard.hinnant at gmail.com
Sat Sep 21 13:25:14 PDT 2013
On Sep 21, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote:
> Author: hhinnant
> Date: Sat Sep 21 14:25:37 2013
> New Revision: 191142
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=191142&view=rev
> Apply LWG 2048. It is amazing to me that this actually works, but the existing tests confirm that it does. c++1y status page now showing libc++ is complete for c++1y modulo dynarray issues.
> This is fantastic!
> I'd love to see a blog post or something about having C++1y (library) implemented during the CD period, and the benefits this provides to the committee and standardization process. =D
I've attempted to send such a post to c++std-news at accu.org. It's been nearly an hour since I tried and I've yet to see it show up.
I don't keep a regular blog. Perhaps someone here knows how to get the following posted on http://isocpp.org?
Marshall Clow set up a detailed checklist for bringing libc++ up to spec with respect to C++1y ahead of the Chicago meeting:
Marshall also diligently set himself the goal of getting everything in this list checked off in time for the Chicago meeting. He completed the lion's share of this list. I helped as much as I was able.
Modulo issues with dynarray (i.e. stack allocation and constructors taking allocators), libc++ has implemented the C++1y spec as it stands today in N3690.
More information about the cfe-commits