[libcxx] r189601 - Mark LWG issues 2109, 222, 2058, 2091 and 2092 as complete. No changes to libc++ code.

[Marshall Clow]

Author: marshall
Date: Thu Aug 29 13:55:55 2013
New Revision: 189601

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=189601&view=rev
Log:
Mark LWG issues 2109, 222, 2058, 2091 and 2092 as complete. No changes to libc++ code.

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html?rev=189601&r1=189600&r2=189601&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html Thu Aug 29 13:55:55 2013
@@ -135,10 +135,10 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2048">2048</a></td><td>Unnecessary mem_fn overloads</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2049">2049</a></td><td>is_destructible is underspecified</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2056">2056</a></td><td>future_errc enums start with value 0 (invalid value for broken_promise)</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2058">2058</a></td><td>valarray and begin/end</td><td>Portland</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2058">2058</a></td><td>valarray and begin/end</td><td>Portland</td><td>2058</td></tr>
   <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2091">2091</a></td><td>Misplaced effect in m.try_lock_for()</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2092">2092</a></td><td>Vague Wording for condition_variable_any</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2091">2091</a></td><td>Misplaced effect in m.try_lock_for()</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2092">2092</a></td><td>Vague Wording for condition_variable_any</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2093">2093</a></td><td>Throws clause of condition_variable::wait with predicate</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2094">2094</a></td><td>duration conversion overflow shouldn't participate in overload resolution</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2122">2122</a></td><td>merge() stability for lists versus forward lists</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2172">2172</a></td><td>Does atomic_compare_exchange_* accept v == nullptr arguments?</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2080">2080</a></td><td>Specify when once_flag becomes invalid</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2098">2098</a></td><td>promise throws clauses</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2109">2109</a></td><td>Incorrect requirements for hash specializations</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2109">2109</a></td><td>Incorrect requirements for hash specializations</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2130">2130</a></td><td>missing ordering constraints for fences</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2138">2138</a></td><td>atomic_flag::clear ordering constraints</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2140">2140</a></td><td>notify_all_at_thread_exit synchronization</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2209">2209</a></td><td>assign() overspecified for sequence containers</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2210">2210</a></td><td>Missing allocator-extended constructor for allocator-aware containers</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2211">2211</a></td><td>Replace ambiguous use of "Allocator" in container requirements</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2222">2222</a></td><td>Inconsistency in description of forward_list::splice_after single-element overload</td><td>Bristol</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2222">2222</a></td><td>Inconsistency in description of forward_list::splice_after single-element overload</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2225">2225</a></td><td>Unrealistic header inclusion checks required</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2229">2229</a></td><td>Standard code conversion facets underspecified</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2231">2231</a></td><td>DR 704 removes complexity guarantee for clear()</td><td>Bristol</td><td>Complete</td></tr>