[PATCH] Fix to PR15537 - assertion failure when comparing atomic unsigned int to int.

[Douglas Gregor]

On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:

> In the process of reviewing this, I ended up with a significantly
> different patch; r185857.  I'd appreciate it if you would look it over
> to see if it makes sense.

Yeah, it LGTM.

	- Doug

> -Eli
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Serge Pavlov <sepavloff at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Friendly ping.
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/4/25 Serge Pavlov <sepavloff at gmail.com>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  There was a similar proposition in another problem
>>> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D673, result of the discussion - atomic
>>> types must be transformed before such checks. This approach is used in this
>>> fix.
>>> 
>>> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D599
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> --Serge
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130708/b7b97017/attachment.html>