XFAIL Headers/cxx11.cpp for Hexagon

[Richard Smith]

Committed in r185565.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Jyotsna Verma <jverma at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Thanks Richard! -ffreestanding takes care of the problem.
>
> -Jyotsna
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
> The Linux Foundation
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: metafoo at gmail.com [mailto:metafoo at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>>Richard Smith
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 4:55 PM
>>To: Jyotsna Verma
>>Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>Subject: Re: XFAIL Headers/cxx11.cpp for Hexagon
>>
>>On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Jyotsna Verma <jverma at codeaurora.org>
>>wrote:
>>>>I would still like an explanation of the nature of the failure. Which
>>> header or
>>>>#include is problematic? Also, this isn't really a C++11 test, it's a
>>>>test
>>> for our
>>>>built-in headers, and even if it were, I don't see why it'd be
>>>>reasonable
>>> to
>>>>XFAIL C++11 tests for Hexagon.
>>>
>>> We do define __STDC_HOSTED__ for Hexagon which probably shouldn't be.
>>> The test includes stdint.h file from lib/Headers which in turn
>>> includes system stdint.h if __STDC_HOSTED__ macro is defined. In
>>> addition, it also requires some other system headers such as
>>> features.h, bits/predefs.h and gnu/stubs-32.h. There is no way for us
>>> to make these header files available in the build area.
>>
>>Does this help:
>>
>>Index: test/Headers/cxx11.cpp
>>===========================================================
>>========
>>--- test/Headers/cxx11.cpp      (revision 185111)
>>+++ test/Headers/cxx11.cpp      (working copy)
>>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>-// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s -// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -
>>std=c++11 -fmodules %s
>>+// RUN: %clang -ffreestanding -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s // RUN:
>>+%clang -ffreestanding -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -fmodules %s
>>
>> #include <stdalign.h>
>