XFAIL Headers/cxx11.cpp for Hexagon
jverma at codeaurora.org
Tue Jul 2 11:27:37 PDT 2013
That's possible that we haven't defined the macro correctly. But at the same
time it's not a good idea for the test to depend on the system headers to
work. For the purpose of this test, this may be necessary. I would still
like to disable the test for Hexagon since we're not planning to support
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation
>From: metafoo at gmail.com [mailto:metafoo at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:17 PM
>To: Jyotsna Verma
>Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>Subject: Re: XFAIL Headers/cxx11.cpp for Hexagon
>On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Jyotsna Verma <jverma at codeaurora.org>
>>> The attached patch XFAILs Headers/cxx11.cpp test for Hexagon as it
>>> doesn't support C++11 and the test depends on some system headers.
>> What's the exact cause of the failure? This sounds like the root cause
>> is probably that Hexagon is incorrectly defining __STDC_HOSTED__.
>Hmm, if it's only the -fmodules part of the test that's failing, then
>that's a different issue (and we should either disable only that half of
>or fix whichever of our headers doesn't work for Hexagon).
More information about the cfe-commits