[PATCH] Have 'this'-returning constructors and destructors to take advantage of the new backend 'returned' attribute

Stephen Lin swlin at post.harvard.edu
Mon May 20 14:15:37 PDT 2013


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Stephen Lin <swlin at post.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Do you think this can go in?
>
> If you have any suggestions for implementation improvements or extra
> tests (either front-end or back-end) let me know; in addition to the
> front-end tests added in this patch the relevant the back-end tests
> are:
>
> llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/this-return.ll
> llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/returned-ext.ll
> llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>

Oh, sorry, here's a recently rebased update of the patches as well.

Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: this-return1.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 16497 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130520/be79b1df/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: this-return2.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 26683 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130520/be79b1df/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list