[patch] Don't compute a "patched" storage class
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 15:10:35 PDT 2013
> Looks like "as written" is a somewhat fuzzy concept for
> instantiations. Maybe it would be more regular to say that a
> instantiated function gets a static storage class if the template
> isStatic()? That should allow us to remove the
> getTemplateSpecializationInfo in isStatic().
The attached patch does it. Do you think it is an improvement?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1655 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cfe-commits