r179040 - In the comparison, both clang and GCC are popular and widely adopted. This is no longer a win of GCC.

[Chris Lattner]

Author: lattner
Date: Mon Apr  8 13:56:15 2013
New Revision: 179040

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=179040&view=rev
Log:
In the comparison, both clang and GCC are popular and widely adopted.  This is no longer a win of GCC.

This whole doc should really be looked at.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html

Modified: cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html?rev=179040&r1=179039&r2=179040&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html Mon Apr  8 13:56:15 2013
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li>
-    <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     </ul>
     
     <p>Pro's of clang vs GCC:</p>