[PATCH] PR13457 (part 1) explicit/implicit calling conventions compatibility in overloads

[Rafael Espíndola]

On 18 March 2013 16:21, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
> What's the status?
> I want this patch to be committed, but I'm not the right person to review it...

You guys probably know better than anyone what the compatibility rules
on windows are, so I guess all that is needed is for Doug or Richard
to review the implementation itself.

Cheers,
Rafael