[PATCH] Adds a CMake package configuration file for libclang

Damien Buhl damien.buhl at lecbna.org
Thu Mar 14 07:59:00 PDT 2013

On 03/14/2013 03:45 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 05:33 PM, Damien Buhl wrote:
>> @Brad King : What do you think about LIBCLANG_LIBRARY_VERSION as a
>> concatenation of :
>> ? Isn't it a problem that patch and tweak version of the lib are the
>> major, minor of clang ?
> This is a decision for Clang/libclang folks to make, not me.
You are right, and it's good that you point it out, so that they feel 
concerned, because in my mail I'm only adressing you on the question.

> The goal is to provide a version number that applications can use
> to ensure the libclang they find will meet their needs.  The
> number is for the interface of libclang, so CINDEX_VERSION_*
> makes sense there IIRC.
> I'm not familiar enough with the relative versioning of Clang to
> libclang to make a specific recommendation on CLANG_VERSION_*
> components.
Yes I'm also a bit unsure of what they prefer and want, but I especially 
asked you because perhaps you would have seen something strange in this 

Thank you for all the advices until now. And thanks for CMake. :)
Damien Buhl
alias daminetreg

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list