r176420 - Improve C11 atomics support:

[Dmitri Gribenko]

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:50 PM, David Chisnall <csdavec at swan.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On 3 Mar 2013, at 16:36, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> I assume you want to check that the output does not contain cmpxchg at
>>> all.  If so, unfortunately, this is not how CHECK-NOT works.  You need
>>> to do a second FileCheck pass over the output to check that (with a
>>> different prefix, of course).
>>>
>>> Dmitri
>>
>> Huh.  Well, the good news is that it's safe to just delete that - it refers to an earlier version of the test.  The bad news is that I didn't spot it before committing...
>
> Will you make this change?

Oh, I see -- r176422, sorry.

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/