r176420 - Improve C11 atomics support:

[David Chisnall]

On 3 Mar 2013, at 16:36, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> I assume you want to check that the output does not contain cmpxchg at
> all.  If so, unfortunately, this is not how CHECK-NOT works.  You need
> to do a second FileCheck pass over the output to check that (with a
> different prefix, of course).
> 
> Dmitri

Huh.  Well, the good news is that it's safe to just delete that - it refers to an earlier version of the test.  The bad news is that I didn't spot it before committing...

David