r173825 - [driver] Refactor the driver so that a failing commands doesn't prevent

[Eric Christopher]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote:

> Matthew,
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Matthew Curtis <mcurtis at codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Chad,
>
> Could you provide a little more background on why it's important to
> execute subsequent commands after one fails?
>
>
> It is required for Unix conformance testing. :)
>
>
Have a link? This seems crazy.

-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130226/385ab918/attachment.html>