r174619 - XFAIL test that's inappropriate for AArch64 ABI

Tim Northover Tim.Northover at arm.com
Thu Feb 7 07:11:41 PST 2013


Author: tnorthover
Date: Thu Feb  7 09:11:40 2013
New Revision: 174619

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=174619&view=rev
Log:
XFAIL test that's inappropriate for AArch64 ABI

Only some ABIs require the "signext" attribute on parameters. On most
platforms, however, it's a useful test so it's best not to limit it to some
random arbitrary platform.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c?rev=174619&r1=174618&r2=174619&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c Thu Feb  7 09:11:40 2013
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -o - -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s
+// XFAIL: aarch64
+
 // PR1513
 
+// AArch64 ABI actually requires the reverse of what this is testing: the callee
+// does any extensions and remaining bits are unspecified.
+
+// Technically this test wasn't written to test that feature, but it's a
+// valuable check nevertheless.
+
 struct s{
 long a;
 long b;





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list