[cfe-commits] r170260 - in /cfe/trunk/docs: AnalyzerRegions.rst analyzer/AnalyzerRegions.rst index.rst

Sean Silva silvas at purdue.edu
Tue Dec 18 12:41:13 PST 2012


> Yes, I absolutely agree with the both of you here.  The only points I wanted
> to make clearly were…
>
> (1) We don't care about clang.llvm.org/analyzer
>
> (2) We care very much about clang-analyzer.llvm.org.

Ah, ok I won't mess with that then. Thanks for making it clear.

-- Sean Silva

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 11:29 , Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>
> But it has its own website, clang-analyzer.llvm.org.
>
>
> I'm curious about this. Why is it not sufficient to simply be
> clang.llvm.org/analyzer (which works)?
>
>
> For reference, the fact that this URL works is a curiosity, not something
> users know about.  We don't direct users to that URL.  I did not come up
> with this setup.  Apparently it was easier to setup the website this way at
> the time.  If it makes sense to move the analyzer website to a different
> repository, I am completely in favor of doing so.
>
>
> ...although I agree with Sean that docs/analyzer/ should stay in the same
> repo as the analyzer source (even if it moves elsewhere in the Clang repo).
>
>
> Yes, I absolutely agree with the both of you here.  The only points I wanted
> to make clearly were…
>
> (1) We don't care about clang.llvm.org/analyzer
>
> (2) We care very much about clang-analyzer.llvm.org.
>
> I very much appreciate all the work that Sean is doing here.




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list