[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Indentation fixes for clang-format.

[Daniel Jasper]

  I don't disagree, but it is also not easy to do. Do you consider that a precondition for this patch?


================
Comment at: lib/Format/Format.cpp:300
@@ +299,3 @@
+      // previous result unless we have hit the optimatization (and thus
+      // returned UINT_MAX) and are now computing for a lower StopAt.
+      unsigned SavedResult = I->second.first;
----------------
Manuel Klimek wrote:
> s/lower/higher/
No longer applicable

================
Comment at: lib/Format/Format.cpp:298
@@ +297,3 @@
+    if (I != Memory.end()) {
+      // If this state has already been examined, we can safely return the
+      // previous result unless we have hit the optimatization (and thus
----------------
Manuel Klimek wrote:
> I think it would be easier for me to read if this were written positively, instead of with "unless".
How about this?


http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D172