[cfe-commits] [llvm-commits] [Patch] Move TargetData from Target to Support/VMCore

Hal Finkel hfinkel at anl.gov
Wed Sep 26 11:07:02 PDT 2012


On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:16:22 -0700
Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I understand why you are requesting this but I thinking moving
> TargetData to support is conceptually dirty.

Can you please explain this? I think that the opposite is true: Having
TargetData in Target is conceptually dirty. TargetData represents
'target information that is available to frontends and IR-level
passes without linking to the target descriptions'. As a result, I feel
that TargetData does not belong with the target-description
infrastructure, and so it should be moved out of Target so that
everyone can use it.

> Nadav is going to
> propose a BOF at the DevMeeting to talk about designing an
> abstraction to expose target information to LLVM ir.

Great!

Thanks again,
Hal

> Can we hold off
> this kind of change for now?
> 
> Losing the ability to verify isn't a strong enough argument for an
> immediate change. I don't follow the auto-upgrade argument. Can you
> elaborate?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Evan
> 
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 4:08 PM, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > This time with the actual patch
> >  
> > From: Villmow, Micah 
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 4:08 PM
> > To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Subject: [Patch] Move TargetData from Target to Support/VMCore
> >  
> > I have attached a patch which moves TargetData from Target to
> > Support/VMCore. The reason why I would like to have this change can
> > be read about in more detail in message [1][2], which in turn is
> > required for [3]. In short, I need the capability of querying, if
> > available, target specific information in the bitcode during
> > verifier and the auto-upgrade mechanism. Because TargetData is in
> > the target directory, a circular dependency is created when the
> > verifier and auto-upgrade mechanism utilize the information. Please
> > let me know what you think and if this approach isn't good,
> > possible alternate solutions, Micah 
> >  
> > [1]
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-September/053277.html
> > [2]
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-September/053166.html
> > [3]
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-August/052639.html
> > <move_target_data_to_support_vmcore.txt>_______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> 



-- 
Hal Finkel
Postdoctoral Appointee
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list