[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Mark ARCMT test cases as XFAIL on ARM

[David Tweed]

Hi Wei-ren,

Could you post the configure setup you're using to build llvm/clang please? It looks like a lot of your "extra" failures are due to a function call specification

arm_aapcscc

being added to function prototypes, and that's breaking regexps. I think these are "optional annotations", so I wonder what's causing your build to insert them and mine not to?

FWIW, mine is

env CC="ccache /usr/bin/gcc " CXX="ccache /usr/bin/g++ " ./configure -C --disable-bindings --build=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi --host=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi --target=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon --with-abi=aapcs --with-float=hard --enable-assertions

Cheers,
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) [mailto:chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw] 
Sent: 19 September 2012 10:01
To: David Tweed
Cc: 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen); James Molloy; cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark ARCMT test cases as XFAIL on ARM

  Quick question. Did you build with "--enable-optimized"?

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:39:27AM +0100, David Tweed wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here's my config:
> 
> Linux llvmbb-debug-1 3.4.0-1-linaro-lt-omap #1~120625232503-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 26 01:25:56 UTC 2012 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
> g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
> GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.22) 1.11
> 
> Full make check-all VERBOSE=1 'LIT_ARGS=-v -j 4' output attached, but the interesting bit is:
> 
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> ********************
> Unexpected Passing Tests (2):
>     Clang :: CodeGen/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c
>     Clang :: CodeGenCXX/member-alignment.cpp
> 
> ********************
> Failing Tests (18):
>     Clang :: CXX/conv/conv.prom/p2.cpp
>     Clang :: CodeGenCXX/compound-literals.cpp
>     Clang :: CodeGenCXX/devirtualize-virtual-function-calls-final.cpp
>     Clang :: CodeGenCXX/throw-expression-cleanup.cpp
>     Clang :: Driver/hello.c
>     Clang :: PCH/cxx-typeid.cpp
>     Clang :: Sema/return.c
>     Clang :: Sema/wchar.c
>     Clang :: SemaTemplate/example-dynarray.cpp
>     LLVM :: Analysis/Profiling/load-branch-weights-ifs.ll
>     LLVM :: Analysis/Profiling/load-branch-weights-loops.ll
>     LLVM :: Analysis/Profiling/load-branch-weights-switches.ll
>     LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/2002-12-16-ArgTest.ll
>     LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/test-fp-no-external-funcs.ll
>     LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/test-fp.ll
>     LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/JIT.GlobalInFunction
>     LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/JITTest.AvailableExternallyGlobalIsntEmitted
>     LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/JITTest.FunctionPointersOutliveTheirCreator
> 
>   Expected Passes    : 11706
>   Expected Failures  : 101
>   Unsupported Tests  : 14
>   Unexpected Passes  : 2
>   Unexpected Failures: 18
> 
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> The clang ones are mostly either ABI issues or paths not picking up files, the LLVM ones are all related to JITing in one way or another.
> 
> I can't off the top of my head think what might be causing you to see so many more failures: if anyone has any thoughts...
> 
> Cheers,
> David
> 
> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium.  Thank you.



-- 
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj