[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Change counter-intuitive behavior of isDerivedFrom

[Sean Silva]

  This patch is *pure evil* since it subtly changes the meaning of
  existing code. It's better to just come up with completely new names
  so that existing code, instead of silently misbehaving, will instead
  fail to compile.

  I think that isA is clearer for the non-strict base-of/derived-from
  anyway: much less error prone. I think it would be good to have a
  patch that just renames isBaseOf to isA.

  In a later patch, you can then introduce a matcher for strict
  base-of/derived-from notion.

  --Sean Silva

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D37