[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Ignored calling conventions

[João Matos]

I actually liked the patch you posted on IRC better. It modified the
mangling while it was being stored on FunctionType, which means mangling
code (and code gen?) don't need to me modified. This one is duplicating the
same logic in both mangling and code-gen.

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:58 AM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>
> How ignored is it, exactly?  Is it still checked syntactically? for
> redundancy? in the type system at all?
>
> Basically, I'm asking if we can #define it. :)
>
> John.


Won't we lose the type information on the AST then? And have the problems
Aaron mentioned such as incorrect behavior when pretty-printing or
rewriting code.

-- 
João Matos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120907/016d4d8b/attachment.html>