[cfe-commits] [Patch 5 of 7] -verify fixes and enhancement

[Jordan Rose]

On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:

> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 5:39 PM, Jordan Rose wrote:
>> Uh, hang on. Is there a reason to use std::set instead of
>> SmallPtrSet<const FileEntry *> and DenseSet<FileID>?
> 
> Well, there's a technical reason and a non-technical reason.  The latter is simply that when I started this patch, I didn't know of the existance of DenseSet et al.  Regarding the former, unless I'm mistaken, SmallPtrSet doesn't have a "find" method which seems a little odd, but means a scan using iterators.
> 
> Anyway, by all means use DenseSet for both instead of std::set in the two typedefs.  No other changes seem necessary (as far as I see).  Ultimately, it will become academic since these lists are only maintained to handle the post-processing check for missed diagnostics.  When this is fixed correctly, as I've discussed elsewhere, then these lists will hopefully become obsolete.
> 
> Are you happy just to make the changes as you commit?  The "#include <set>" can also drop out.
> 
> Cheers
> Andy

SmallPtrSet doesn't have 'find' but it does have 'count', which returns a bool (by analogy with std::set's count, though that returns a 1 or 0 integer).

I'll go ahead and make those changes and then commit!
Jordan