[cfe-commits] r160034 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/visibility.cpp

John McCall rjmccall at apple.com
Tue Jul 10 22:05:01 PDT 2012

On Jul 10, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola wrote:
>> Does this do the right thing for explicit specializations?
> Good question. I would probably expect the specialization to take the
> visibility of push, and the attached patch implements it.
> Unfortunately gcc disagrees and in the testcase included in the patch
> it produces undefined references for the method in vector<int> and
> vector<unsigned>.
> What do you think?

Could this code just reasonably be moved to ActOnTagFinishDefinition?


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list