[cfe-commits] [Patch 4 of 7] -verify fixes and enhancement

Andy Gibbs andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk
Mon Jul 9 14:21:29 PDT 2012

Bah, I missed your post and put up a poll at almost the same time to cfe-dev on this issue.

Oops :o)

From: Richard Smith 
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 11:08 PM
To: Jordan Rose 
Cc: Andy Gibbs ; cfe-commits cfe 
Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] [Patch 4 of 7] -verify fixes and enhancement

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:

  On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:41 , Andy Gibbs <andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

  > So, in conclusion, we have the choice now: use the above patch and have fatal
  > errors shown but all other diagnostics suppressed, or I can fix the patch from
  > last time with your comment above and we can use -verify to even check fatal
  > errors.
  > I am personally happy with either route.  I can see advantages both ways.

  I prefer this approach, but I'm hoping someone else can comment here. It's something that really affects the behavior of -verify.

-verify already works when checking fatal errors, and is currently used for that by several tests. What doesn't work currently is printing out the -verify summary after a fatal error occurs, if there are mismatches between expectations and diagnostics. So let's just fix that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120709/cbe19e79/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list