[cfe-commits] [Patch 4 of 7] -verify fixes and enhancement
andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk
Mon Jul 9 14:21:29 PDT 2012
Bah, I missed your post and put up a poll at almost the same time to cfe-dev on this issue.
From: Richard Smith
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 11:08 PM
To: Jordan Rose
Cc: Andy Gibbs ; cfe-commits cfe
Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] [Patch 4 of 7] -verify fixes and enhancement
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:41 , Andy Gibbs <andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> So, in conclusion, we have the choice now: use the above patch and have fatal
> errors shown but all other diagnostics suppressed, or I can fix the patch from
> last time with your comment above and we can use -verify to even check fatal
> I am personally happy with either route. I can see advantages both ways.
I prefer this approach, but I'm hoping someone else can comment here. It's something that really affects the behavior of -verify.
-verify already works when checking fatal errors, and is currently used for that by several tests. What doesn't work currently is printing out the -verify summary after a fatal error occurs, if there are mismatches between expectations and diagnostics. So let's just fix that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-commits