[cfe-commits] [PATCH] AST matchers

[Manuel Klimek]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:

> CamelCase is fine for these. I notice that there's some inconsistency with
> 'has' names, e.g., hasDescendant vs. HasType.
>

Update: Chandler voted for using llvm coding style (and I agree). The
argument is that the callable classes we have are just classes to work
around missing variadic templates and that they will become functions
anyway once we get C++11 into llvm (in a future, far, far away).

Thoughts?
/Manuel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120629/3a13f35a/attachment.html>