[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Abstract v-table generation into the CGCXXABI interface

[Timur Iskhodzhanov]

FYI, by "regression" I meant there was a functionality which was not
broken but rather disabled as a whole :)

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Regressions are not OK. Unless the fix is imminent, we should revert and
> work on a correct patch.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> FTR, this patch has regressed:
>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13231
>>
>> Now I can't build non-trivial C++ code anymore.
>> [I had local patches to work OK on some files and was planning to send
>> a few things for review but now I'm literally stuck at ~r158985]
>>
>> Please fix this ASAP or I'll have to revert it (locally, maybe; but
>> this is still not cool).
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Jun 23, 2012, at 1:11 PM, John McCall wrote:
>> >> The remaining trivial patch, which just declares, defines, and calls
>> >> EmitVTables, is approved.
>> > Thanks, r159091.
>> >
>> > Chip
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cfe-commits mailing list
>> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>