[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Fix test case failure due to C++ ABI difference on ARM

[James Molloy]

This LGTM, but please wait for the OK of a more experienced reviewer
before committing.

Cheers,

James

On 1 May 2012 09:32, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
>  James sugguests me that we should use name ITANIUM rather than X86 since we
> are dealing with Itanium C++ ABI (used by x86) and ARM ABI. Please use the
> attach new patch instead of the old one. Thanks!
>
>>   This patch addresses x86/ARM C++ ABI difference on member function pointer.
>> You can see more detail in Sec. 3.2.1 "Representation of pointer to member
>> function" [1].
>>
>> Regards,
>> chenwj
>>
>> [1]
>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0041c/IHI0041C_cppabi.pdf
>
> Regards,
> chenwj
>
> --
> Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
> Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
> Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
> Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
> Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj