[cfe-commits] Please review: add -fthread-sanitizer clang flag

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at google.com
Thu Mar 1 13:49:18 PST 2012


On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:

> This needs to be documented in the clang user's manual and release notes.
>

Agreed, but I think that might be good to leave until the runtime and the
rest of the infrastructure becomes more clear? I was imagining this is
still early-stage development. Is there a good place to document features
in-progress but specifically not ready for prime-time?


>
> -Chris
>
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>
> ping.
> (fresh patch which applies to r151830 attached).
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Please review the following clang patch that adds a
>> flag -fthread-sanitizer.
>> This flag enables ThreadSanitizer instrumentation committed to llvm as
>> r150423.
>> The patch includes one test for -fthread-sanitizer and one similar test
>> for -faddress-sanitizer.
>> This patch does not modify the linker flags (as we do it
>> for -faddress-sanitizer) because the run-time library is not yet
>> committed and it's structure in compiler-rt is not 100% clear.
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/5663045/
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --kcc
>>
>
> <issue5663045_2001.diff>_______________________________________________
>
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120301/0cec1641/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list