[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Implements support to run standalone tools

Manuel Klimek klimek at google.com
Tue Jan 31 13:40:43 PST 2012


On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:20 PM, nobled <nobled at dreamwidth.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:31 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:34 PM, nobled <nobled at dreamwidth.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Ping + a re-based version of the patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This looks really cool. Aside from the create()/New() half-rename confusion,
>>>>> just some minor nits:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +/// \brief Returns a new FrontendActionFactory for any type that provides an
>>>>>> +/// implementation of NewFrontendAction().
>>>>>> +///
>>>>>> +/// FactoryT must implement: FrontendAction *NewFrontendAction().
>>>>>> +///
>>>>>> +/// Example:
>>>>>> +/// struct ProvidesFrontendActions {
>>>>>> +///   FrontendActionFactory *NewFrontendAction();
>>>>> You meant "FrontendAction *" here, right?
>>>>
>>>> Yep, done. Thx for the catch.
>>>>
>>>>>> +/// } Factory;
>>>>>> +/// FrontendActionFactory *FactoryAdapter =
>>>>>> +///   newFrontendActionFactory(&Factory);
>>>>>> +template <typename FactoryT>
>>>>>> +FrontendActionFactory *newFrontendActionFactory(FactoryT *ActionFactory);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/// \brief Runs (and deletes) the tool on 'Code' with the -fsynatx-only flag.
>>>>> syntax*
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>>>> +///
>>>>>> +/// \param ToolAction The action to run over the code.
>>>>>> +/// \param Code C++ code.
>>>>>> +///
>>>>>> +/// \return - True if 'ToolAction' was successfully executed.
>>>>>> +bool runSyntaxOnlyToolOnCode(
>>>>>> +    clang::FrontendAction *ToolAction, llvm::StringRef Code);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +/// \brief Converts a vector<string> into a vector<char*> suitable to pass
>>>>>> +/// to main-style functions taking (int Argc, char *Argv[]).
>>>>>> +std::vector<char*> commandLineToArgv(const std::vector<std::string> *Command);
>>>>> This looks like it can just take an ArrayRef<const std::string>...
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>
> Oops, sorry for confusing you with the const thing. My bad.

No problem, something good happened: I found a really bad diagnostic :)

>>>>>> +/// \see JsonCompileCommandLineDatabase
>>>>>> +CompileCommand findCompileArgsInJsonDatabase(
>>>>>> +    llvm::StringRef FileName, llvm::StringRef JsonDatabase,
>>>>>> +    std::string &ErrorMessage);
>>>>> Just a note on the whole patch: you don't need the llvm:: prefix on StringRef
>>>>> or ArrayRef, or a few other common types in clang code anymore. You just have
>>>>> to include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h" to use them inside the clang namespace.
>>>>
>>>> Cool, done.
>>>>
>>>>>> +  /// \brief Returns the file manager used in the tool.
>>>>>> +  ///
>>>>>> +  /// The file manager is shared between all translation units.
>>>>>> +  FileManager &getFiles() { return Files; }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + private:
>>>>>> +  /// \brief Add translation units to run the tool over.
>>>>>> +  ///
>>>>>> +  /// Translation units not found in JsonDatabaseDirectory (see constructore)
>>>>> constructor*
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>>>> +  /// will be skipped.
>>>>>> +  void addTranslationUnits(
>>>>>> +      llvm::StringRef JsonDatabaseDirectory,
>>>>>> +      llvm::ArrayRef<std::string> TranslationUnits);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  // We store command lines as pair (file name, command line).
>>>>>> +  typedef std::pair< std::string, std::vector<std::string> > CommandLine;
>>>>>> +  std::vector<CommandLine> CommandLines;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  FileManager Files;
>>>>>> +  // Maps <file name> -> <file content>.
>>>>>> +  std::map<std::string, std::string> MappedFileContents;
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +template <typename T>
>>>>>> +FrontendActionFactory *newFrontendActionFactory() {
>>>>>> +  class SimpleFrontendActionFactory : public FrontendActionFactory {
>>>>>> +  public:
>>>>>> +    virtual clang::FrontendAction *New() { return new T; }
>>>>> You mean "create()"?
>>>>
>>>> Yep, missing tests... Added.
>>>>
>>>>>> +  };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  return new SimpleFrontendActionFactory;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +template <typename FactoryT>
>>>>>> +FrontendActionFactory *newFrontendActionFactory(FactoryT *ActionFactory) {
>>>>>> +  class FrontendActionFactoryAdapter : public FrontendActionFactory {
>>>>>> +  public:
>>>>>> +    explicit FrontendActionFactoryAdapter(FactoryT *ActionFactory)
>>>>>> +      : ActionFactory(ActionFactory) {}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    virtual clang::FrontendAction *New() {
>>>>> "create()" here, too... It looks like these templates aren't covered by the
>>>>> unittest/getting instantiated at all.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, correct. This is tested by other tests in our branch, but it
>>>> makes sense to test them independently as part of this layer, too.
>>>> Added a unit test.
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt b/lib/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..b0e1235
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/lib/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>>>>> +set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS support)
>>>>>> +SET(LLVM_USED_LIBS clangBasic clangFrontend clangAST clangRewrite)
>>>>> Here and in unittest/Tooling/Makefile, you set a dependency on the Rewrite lib,
>>>>> but I don't see any Rewrite/ includes. Is there a reason for that?
>>>>
>>>> I forgot to rip them out when I separated the dependencies from the
>>>> refactoring library in our branch (upcoming super awesome feature ;).
>>>> Removed.
>
> The other one is still there:
>
> diff --git a/unittests/Tooling/Makefile b/unittests/Tooling/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4c5ba76
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/unittests/Tooling/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +##===- unittests/Tooling/Makefile --------------------------*-
> Makefile -*-===##
> +#
> +#                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
> +#
> +# This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
> +# License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
> +#
> +##===----------------------------------------------------------------------===##
> +
> +CLANG_LEVEL = ../..
> +TESTNAME = Tooling
> +LINK_COMPONENTS := support mc
> +USEDLIBS = clangTooling.a clangFrontend.a clangSerialization.a clangDriver.a \
> +           clangRewrite.a clangParse.a clangSema.a clangAnalysis.a \
> +           clangAST.a clangLex.a clangBasic.a
> +
> +include $(CLANG_LEVEL)/unittests/Makefile

Hah, missed that. Updated patch and did an extra grep to make sure :)

>
>>>>
>>>>>> +bool ToolInvocation::run() {
>>>>>> +  const std::vector<char*> Argv = commandLineToArgv(&CommandLine);
>>>>>> +  const char *const BinaryName = Argv[0];
>>>>>> +  DiagnosticOptions DefaultDiagnosticOptions;
>>>>>> +  TextDiagnosticPrinter DiagnosticPrinter(
>>>>>> +      llvm::errs(), DefaultDiagnosticOptions);
>>>>>> +  DiagnosticsEngine Diagnostics(llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::DiagnosticIDs>(
>>>>>> +      new DiagnosticIDs()), &DiagnosticPrinter, false);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +  const llvm::OwningPtr<clang::driver::Driver> Driver(
>>>>>> +      newDriver(&Diagnostics, BinaryName));
>>>>>> +  // Since the input might only be virtual, don't check whether it exists.
>>>>>> +  Driver->setCheckInputsExist(false);
>>>>>> +  const llvm::OwningPtr<clang::driver::Compilation> Compilation(
>>>>>> +      Driver->BuildCompilation(llvm::ArrayRef<const char*>(
>>>>>> +          &Argv[0], Argv.size() - 1)));
>>>>> (The fact that the Driver entrypoint need a song and dance to produce
>>>>> a char * array
>>>>> is annoying, but that's obviously a pre-existing problem with the
>>>>> API... I'm hoping
>>>>> to fix that in the future.)
>>>>>
>>>>>> +ClangTool::ClangTool(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>>> +    : Files((FileSystemOptions())) {
>>>>>> +  if (argc < 3) {
>>>>>> +    llvm::outs() << "Usage: " << argv[0] << " <cmake-output-dir> "
>>>>>> +                 << "<file1> <file2> ...\n";
>>>>>> +    exit(1);
>>>>> This looks like a good place to use llvm::report_fatal_error() instead. Same
>>>>> for the two other exit(1) calls below.
>>>>
>>>> Done.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +  }
>>>>>> +  addTranslationUnits(argv[1], std::vector<std::string>(argv + 2, argv + argc));
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void ClangTool::addTranslationUnits(
>>>>>> +    llvm::StringRef JsonDatabaseDirectory,
>>>>>> +    llvm::ArrayRef<std::string> TranslationUnits) {
>>>>> TranslationUnits can just be an ArrayRef<StringRef> here.
>>>>
>>>> We're handing in a vector<string> which we created from argv, argc in
>>>> the ClangTool constructor. Is there a magic way to create a
>>>> ArrayRef<StringRef> from a vector<string> that can't figure out?
>>>
>>> I think the implication is that you'd create a vector<StringRef>
>>> instead, to match the ArrayRef<StringRef> parameter. Does that
>>> work/make sense?
>>
>> Heh, yea, that obviously makes sense... I should go home now, it's
>> getting late :)
>>
>> Please find the updated patch attached.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> /Manuel
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> +  llvm::SmallString<1024> JsonDatabasePath(JsonDatabaseDirectory);
>>>>>> +  llvm::sys::path::append(JsonDatabasePath, "compile_commands.json");
>>>>>> +  llvm::OwningPtr<llvm::MemoryBuffer> JsonDatabase;
>>>>>> +  llvm::error_code Result =
>>>>>> +      llvm::MemoryBuffer::getFile(JsonDatabasePath, JsonDatabase);
>>>>>> +  if (Result != 0) {
>>>>>> +    llvm::outs() << "Error while opening JSON database: " << Result.message()
>>>>>> +                 << "\n";
>>>>>> +    exit(1);
>>>>>> +  }
>>>>>> +  llvm::StringRef BaseDirectory(::getenv("PWD"));
>>>>>> +  for (unsigned I = 0; I < TranslationUnits.size(); ++I) {
>>>>>> +    llvm::SmallString<1024> File(getAbsolutePath(
>>>>>> +        TranslationUnits[I], BaseDirectory));
>>>>>> +    std::string ErrorMessage;
>>>>>> +    clang::tooling::CompileCommand LookupResult =
>>>>>> +        clang::tooling::findCompileArgsInJsonDatabase(
>>>>>> +            File.str(), JsonDatabase->getBuffer(), ErrorMessage);
>>>>>> +    if (!ErrorMessage.empty()) {
>>>>>> +      llvm::outs() << "Error while parsing JSON database: " << ErrorMessage
>>>>>> +                   << "\n";
>>>>>> +      exit(1);
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +    if (!LookupResult.CommandLine.empty()) {
>>>>>> +      if (!LookupResult.Directory.empty()) {
>>>>>> +        // FIXME: What should happen if CommandLine includes -working-directory
>>>>>> +        // as well?
>>>>>> +        LookupResult.CommandLine.push_back(
>>>>>> +            "-working-directory=" + LookupResult.Directory);
>>>>>> +      }
>>>>>> +      CommandLines.push_back(make_pair(File.str(), LookupResult.CommandLine));
>>>>>> +    } else {
>>>>>> +      // FIXME: There are two use cases here: doing a fuzzy
>>>>>> +      // "find . -name '*.cc' |xargs tool" match, where as a user I don't care
>>>>>> +      // about the .cc files that were not found, and the use case where I
>>>>>> +      // specify all files I want to run over explicitly, where this should
>>>>>> +      // be an error. We'll want to add an option for this.
>>>>>> +      llvm::outs() << "Skipping " << File << ". Command line not found.\n";
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +  }
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +void ClangTool::mapVirtualFiles(
>>>>>> +    const std::map<std::string, std::string> &FileContents) {
>>>>> At first glance, MappedFileContents in both ToolInvocation and ClangTool
>>>>> looks like it can just be a std::map<StringRef,StringRef>. Does it really need
>>>>> to have ownership of its own malloc'd copy of the file contents?
>>>>
>>>> An excellent point. Changed.
>>>>
>>>>>> +  MappedFileContents.insert(FileContents.begin(), FileContents.end());
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +int ClangTool::run(FrontendActionFactory *ActionFactory) {
>>>>> It also looks like the ClangTool class isn't covered by the unittest, either.
>>>>
>>>> I added ClangCheck.cpp and an integration test. I first wanted to keep
>>>> this change smaller, but leaving out clang-check and an integration
>>>> test was probably a little over the top...
>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to this landing!
>>>>
>>>> Me too :) Thanks a lot for reviewing!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> /Manuel
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 11:03 +0100, Manuel Klimek wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The attached patch adds support to run clang tools (FrontendActions)
>>>>>>>>> as standalone tools, or repeatedly in-memory in a process.
>>>>>>>>> This is useful for unit testing, map-reduce-style applications, source
>>>>>>>>> transformation daemons, and command line tools.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am also interested in having this kind of functionality. A few quick
>>>>>>>> comments:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. The coding standards say that function names should begin with a
>>>>>>>> lower-case letter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done. I jumped on the opportunity to dogfood refactoring support in
>>>>>>> our current tooling branch and wrote a script that changed all
>>>>>>> incorrectly named functions automatically (and created a sed-script to
>>>>>>> post-produce comment changes, which made me notice a bug in a
>>>>>>> comment).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. The comments contain several references to CMake; what, if anything,
>>>>>>>> in this patch is tied to CMake, or designed to be compatible with CMake?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2b.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +/// \param JsonDatabase A JSON formatted list of compile commands.
>>>>>>>>> This lookup
>>>>>>>>> +/// command supports only a subset of the JSON standard as written by
>>>>>>>>> CMake.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please be more verbose here. What is not supported?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Generally, I think that it would be helpful for you to provide a
>>>>>>>> paragraph or two explaining how this extension is to be used, what kind
>>>>>>>> of things can be specified in JSON inputs, how this ties into CMake (or
>>>>>>>> not), etc. with a few small examples. Some of this can be gleaned from
>>>>>>>> the test case, but some nicely-formatted text (without all of the
>>>>>>>> escaping) would, IMHO, be earlier to read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hopefully better expressed now. Please let me know if you want more /
>>>>>>> different details.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the review!
>>>>>>> /Manuel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  -Hal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> /Manuel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rietveld link:
>>>>>>>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/5570054/
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>>>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Hal Finkel
>>>>>>>> Postdoctoral Appointee
>>>>>>>> Leadership Computing Facility
>>>>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tooling.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 47757 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120131/d1a10c5b/attachment.obj>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list