[cfe-commits] [patch] Alternative fix for pr9614

Rafael Ávila de Espíndola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 13:56:42 PDT 2011

> It looks ok to me, but wouldn't it be more efficient to somehow abort
> IR generation for the current function if we find ourselves building
> a trivially recursive call instruction?

Maybe, I am not sure how easy it is to backtrack. At this point we would 
already have created the function itself and the first BB I think.

> Thanks,


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list