[cfe-commits] r137430 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp test/Analysis/unused-ivars.m test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp test/SemaCXX/ambig-user-defined-conversions.cpp test/SemaCXX/expression-traits.cpp test/SemaObjC/id-isa-ref.m

NAKAMURA Takumi geek4civic at gmail.com
Thu Aug 11 22:49:52 PDT 2011


Author: chapuni
Date: Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
New Revision: 137430

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=137430&view=rev
Log:
De-Unicode-ify.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/unused-ivars.m
    cfe/trunk/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ambig-user-defined-conversions.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/expression-traits.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/id-isa-ref.m

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp?rev=137430&r1=137429&r2=137430&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@
 ///         octal-escape-sequence
 ///         hexadecimal-escape-sequence
 ///       simple-escape-sequence:
-///         one of \’ \" \? \\ \a \b \f \n \r \t \v
+///         one of \' \" \? \\ \a \b \f \n \r \t \v
 ///       octal-escape-sequence:
 ///         \ octal-digit
 ///         \ octal-digit octal-digit
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@
 ///         octal-escape-sequence
 ///         hexadecimal-escape-sequence
 ///       simple-escape-sequence:
-///         one of \’ \" \? \\ \a \b \f \n \r \t \v
+///         one of \' \" \? \\ \a \b \f \n \r \t \v
 ///       octal-escape-sequence:
 ///         \ octal-digit
 ///         \ octal-digit octal-digit

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/unused-ivars.m
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/unused-ivars.m?rev=137430&r1=137429&r2=137430&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/unused-ivars.m (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/unused-ivars.m Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 @end
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 // <rdar://problem/8481311> Unused bitfield ivars trigger cause weird
-// diagnostic: "Instance variable '' in class…"
+// diagnostic: "Instance variable '' in class..."
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 @interface RDar8481311 {

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp?rev=137430&r1=137429&r2=137430&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/basic/basic.lookup/basic.lookup.classref/p3.cpp Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
 
 // C++0x [basic.lookup.classref]p3:
-//   If the unqualified-id is ∼type-name, the type-name is looked up in the 
+//   If the unqualified-id is ~type-name, the type-name is looked up in the 
 //   context of the entire postfix-expression. If the type T of the object 
 //   expression is of a class type C, the type-name is also looked up in the 
 //   scope of class C. At least one of the lookups shall find a name that 

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ambig-user-defined-conversions.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ambig-user-defined-conversions.cpp?rev=137430&r1=137429&r2=137430&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ambig-user-defined-conversions.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/ambig-user-defined-conversions.cpp Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
     E b;
     f1(b);  // expected-error {{call to 'f1' is ambiguous}}	
             // ambiguous because b -> C via constructor and
-            // b → A via constructor or conversion function.
+            // b -> A via constructor or conversion function.
   }
 }
 

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/expression-traits.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/expression-traits.cpp?rev=137430&r1=137429&r2=137430&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/expression-traits.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/expression-traits.cpp Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
 
 void expr_6()
 {
-    // expr/6: If an expression initially has the type “reference to T”
+    // expr/6: If an expression initially has the type "reference to T"
     // (8.3.2, 8.5.3), ... the expression is an lvalue.
     int x = 0;
     int& referenceToInt = x;
@@ -310,9 +310,9 @@
 {
     // expr.sub/1 A postfix expression followed by an expression in
     // square brackets is a postfix expression. One of the expressions
-    // shall have the type “pointer to T” and the other shall have
+    // shall have the type "pointer to T" and the other shall have
     // enumeration or integral type. The result is an lvalue of type
-    // “T.”
+    // "T."
     ASSERT_LVALUE(pointer[1]);
     
     // The expression E1[E2] is identical (by definition) to *((E1)+(E2)).
@@ -348,32 +348,32 @@
 {
     // Applies to expressions of the form E1.E2
     
-    // If E2 is declared to have type “reference to T”, then E1.E2 is
+    // If E2 is declared to have type "reference to T", then E1.E2 is
     // an lvalue;.... Otherwise, one of the following rules applies.
     ASSERT_LVALUE(Class().staticReferenceDataMember);
     ASSERT_LVALUE(Class().referenceDataMember);
     
-    // — If E2 is a static data member, and the type of E2 is T, then
+    // - If E2 is a static data member, and the type of E2 is T, then
     // E1.E2 is an lvalue; ...
     ASSERT_LVALUE(Class().staticNonreferenceDataMember);
     ASSERT_LVALUE(Class().staticReferenceDataMember);
 
 
-    // — If E2 is a non-static data member, ... If E1 is an lvalue,
+    // - If E2 is a non-static data member, ... If E1 is an lvalue,
     // then E1.E2 is an lvalue...
     Class lvalue;
     ASSERT_LVALUE(lvalue.dataMember);
     ASSERT_RVALUE(Class().dataMember);
 
-    // — If E1.E2 refers to a static member function, ... then E1.E2
+    // - If E1.E2 refers to a static member function, ... then E1.E2
     // is an lvalue
     ASSERT_LVALUE(Class().StaticMemberFunction);
     
-    // — Otherwise, if E1.E2 refers to a non-static member function,
+    // - Otherwise, if E1.E2 refers to a non-static member function,
     // then E1.E2 is not an lvalue.
     //ASSERT_RVALUE(Class().NonstaticMemberFunction);
 
-    // — If E2 is a member enumerator, and the type of E2 is T, the
+    // - If E2 is a member enumerator, and the type of E2 is T, the
     // expression E1.E2 is not an lvalue. The type of E1.E2 is T.
     ASSERT_RVALUE(Class().Enumerator);
     ASSERT_RVALUE(lvalue.Enumerator);
@@ -404,8 +404,8 @@
 
 void expr_dynamic_cast_5()
 {
-    // expr.dynamic.cast/5: If T is “reference to cv1 B” and v has type
-    // “cv2 D” such that B is a base class of D, the result is an
+    // expr.dynamic.cast/5: If T is "reference to cv1 B" and v has type
+    // "cv2 D" such that B is a base class of D, the result is an
     // lvalue for the unique B sub-object of the D object referred
     // to by v.
     typedef BaseClass B;
@@ -416,13 +416,13 @@
 
 // expr.dynamic.cast/8: The run-time check logically executes as follows:
 //
-// — If, in the most derived object pointed (referred) to by v, v
+// - If, in the most derived object pointed (referred) to by v, v
 // points (refers) to a public base class subobject of a T object, and
 // if only one object of type T is derived from the sub-object pointed
 // (referred) to by v, the result is a pointer (an lvalue referring)
 // to that T object.
 //
-// — Otherwise, if v points (refers) to a public base class sub-object
+// - Otherwise, if v points (refers) to a public base class sub-object
 // of the most derived object, and the type of the most derived object
 // has a base class, of type T, that is unambiguous and public, the
 // result is a pointer (an lvalue referring) to the T sub-object of
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@
     // conversions are performed on the second and third operands, and one
     // of the following shall hold:
     //
-    // — The second or the third operand (but not both) is a
+    // - The second or the third operand (but not both) is a
     // throw-expression (15.1); the result is of the type of the other and
     // is an rvalue.
 
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@
     ASSERT_RVALUE(cond ? throw 1 : classLvalue);
     ASSERT_RVALUE(cond ? classLvalue : throw 1);
 
-    // — Both the second and the third operands have type void; the result
+    // - Both the second and the third operands have type void; the result
     // is of type void and is an rvalue. [Note: this includes the case
     // where both operands are throw-expressions. ]
     ASSERT_RVALUE(cond ? (void)1 : (void)0);

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/id-isa-ref.m
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/id-isa-ref.m?rev=137430&r1=137429&r2=137430&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/id-isa-ref.m (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/id-isa-ref.m Fri Aug 12 00:49:51 2011
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
   Whatever *y;
 
   // GCC allows this, with the following warning: 
-  //   instance variable ‘isa’ is @protected; this will be a hard error in the future
+  //   instance variable 'isa' is @protected; this will be a hard error in the future
   //
   // FIXME: see if we can avoid the 2 warnings that follow the error.
   [(*y).isa self]; // expected-error {{instance variable 'isa' is protected}} \





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list