[cfe-commits] r134302 - /cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com
Sat Jul 2 03:08:26 PDT 2011
> From: Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>
> Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] r134302 -
> To: Jordy Rose <jediknil at belkadan.com>
> Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Message-ID: <B5725724-0AA7-49C1-8BB5-F09412D5AD1C at apple.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 6:06 PM, Jordy Rose wrote:
> > Just to be silly, if we're in an ObjC context and 'NULL' is defined, but
> 'nil' isn't, is 'NULL' preferable to 0? Or is that a contrived situation we
> don't care about?
> It feels contrived to me; 'nil' is generally available in any real ObjC
> > (Also, do we care about 'Nil', the null value for ObjC 'Class' type, and
> 'false' for C99 _Bool?)
> I, personally, don't care much about those particular cases, but we could
> hack them in.
> - Doug
Also, in C++0x, I think "nullptr" would be better, or is that Clang does not
support it yet ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-commits