[cfe-commits] r107264 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms.cpp

Charles Davis cdavis at mymail.mines.edu
Wed Jun 30 15:30:41 PDT 2010

On 6/30/10 2:58 PM, John McCall wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>> On 6/30/10 2:10 PM, John McCall wrote:
>>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:05 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>>>> The "proper" way IMO is to store it in the FunctionType's argument list as an IncompleteArrayType and have canonicalization of the function type decay it to a pointer. Then the mangler will detect that it's mangling a parameter array and mangle it as a const pointer. At least, there really should be some way of detecting that a parameter was declared as an array instead of a pointer.
>>> The type-as-written for the parameter declaration remembers this.
>> How do you get that from a FunctionType? As far as I know, you need a
>> FunctionDecl to get the ParmVarDecls. We don't always have
>> one--particularly when we're mangling pointers to functions (which I
>> haven't really looked at yet).
> Right, which was why I asked about it.
> Does MSVC mangle any other kind of "sugar" differently?  Do all the following
> have the same mangling?
>   typedef int Int;
>   typedef int IntArray[10];
>   void foo(int x[10]);
>   void foo(Int x[10]);
>   void foo(IntArray x);
They are all mangled the same (?foo@@YAXQAH at Z). I'm pretty sure that
typedefs are canonicalized away (except in the case of anonymous tag types).

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list