[cfe-commits] PATCH: Support access checking for address of overloaded static member functions

[Chandler Carruth]

It seems that address-of access checking for static members was broken in
that assumed the name would always be explicitly qualified. Does the
attached patch seem like a reasonable way to address this? Is there a better
pattern?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20100417/f020df6d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: static-member-access.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20100417/f020df6d/attachment.obj>