[cfe-commits] r101155 - in /cfe/trunk:lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp test/CodeGen/decl.c

Nuno Lopes nunoplopes at sapo.pt
Tue Apr 13 15:04:03 PDT 2010


Thanks!
I assume it's now ok to turn padding into undef again?  (btw, do you want to 
review the patch before commit?)

Nuno

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org>
To: <cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:16 PM
Subject: [cfe-commits] r101155 - in 
/cfe/trunk:lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp test/CodeGen/decl.c


> Author: lattner
> Date: Tue Apr 13 13:16:19 2010
> New Revision: 101155
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=101155&view=rev
> Log:
> Rework the ConstStructBuilder code to emit missing initializer
> elements with explicit zero values instead of with tail padding.
> On an example like this:
>
> struct foo { int a; int b; };
>
> struct foo fooarray[] = {
>    {1, 2},
>    {4},
> };
>
> We now lay this out as:
>
> @fooarray = global [2 x %struct.foo] [%struct.foo { i32 1, i32 2 }, 
> %struct.foo { i32 4, i32 0 }]
>
> instead of as:
>
> @fooarray = global %0 <{ %struct.foo { i32 1, i32 2 }, %1 { i32 4, [4 x 
> i8] zeroinitializer } }>
>
> Preserving both the struct type of the second element, but also the array 
> type of the entire thing.
>
>
> Modified:
>    cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp
>    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/decl.c
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp
> URL: 
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp?rev=101155&r1=101154&r2=101155&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp Tue Apr 13 13:16:19 2010
> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@
>     LLVMStructAlignment(1) { }
>
>   bool AppendField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset,
> -                   const Expr *InitExpr);
> +                   llvm::Constant *InitExpr);
>
>   bool AppendBitField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset,
> -                      const Expr *InitExpr);
> +                      llvm::Constant *InitExpr);
>
>   void AppendPadding(uint64_t NumBytes);
>
> @@ -74,18 +74,18 @@
> };
>
> bool ConstStructBuilder::
> -AppendField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset, const Expr 
> *InitExpr){
> +AppendField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset,
> +            llvm::Constant *InitCst) {
>   uint64_t FieldOffsetInBytes = FieldOffset / 8;
>
>   assert(NextFieldOffsetInBytes <= FieldOffsetInBytes
>          && "Field offset mismatch!");
>
>   // Emit the field.
> -  llvm::Constant *C = CGM.EmitConstantExpr(InitExpr, Field->getType(), 
> CGF);
> -  if (!C)
> +  if (!InitCst)
>     return false;
>
> -  unsigned FieldAlignment = getAlignment(C);
> +  unsigned FieldAlignment = getAlignment(InitCst);
>
>   // Round up the field offset to the alignment of the field type.
>   uint64_t AlignedNextFieldOffsetInBytes =
> @@ -111,8 +111,9 @@
>   }
>
>   // Add the field.
> -  Elements.push_back(C);
> -  NextFieldOffsetInBytes = AlignedNextFieldOffsetInBytes + 
> getSizeInBytes(C);
> +  Elements.push_back(InitCst);
> +  NextFieldOffsetInBytes = AlignedNextFieldOffsetInBytes +
> +                             getSizeInBytes(InitCst);
>
>   if (Packed)
>     assert(LLVMStructAlignment == 1 && "Packed struct not byte-aligned!");
> @@ -124,11 +125,8 @@
>
> bool ConstStructBuilder::
>   AppendBitField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset,
> -                 const Expr *InitExpr) {
> -  llvm::ConstantInt *CI =
> -    cast_or_null<llvm::ConstantInt>(CGM.EmitConstantExpr(InitExpr,
> - 
> Field->getType(),
> -                                                         CGF));
> +                 llvm::Constant *InitCst) {
> +  llvm::ConstantInt *CI = cast_or_null<llvm::ConstantInt>(InitCst);
>   // FIXME: Can this ever happen?
>   if (!CI)
>     return false;
> @@ -323,26 +321,34 @@
>   unsigned FieldNo = 0;
>   unsigned ElementNo = 0;
>   for (RecordDecl::field_iterator Field = RD->field_begin(),
> -       FieldEnd = RD->field_end();
> -       ElementNo < ILE->getNumInits() && Field != FieldEnd;
> -       ++Field, ++FieldNo) {
> +       FieldEnd = RD->field_end(); Field != FieldEnd; ++Field, ++FieldNo) 
> {
> +
> +    // If this is a union, skip all the fields that aren't being 
> initialized.
>     if (RD->isUnion() && ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion() != *Field)
>       continue;
>
> -    if (Field->isBitField()) {
> -      if (!Field->getIdentifier())
> -        continue;
> +    // Don't emit anonymous bitfields, they just affect layout.
> +    if (Field->isBitField() && !Field->getIdentifier())
> +      continue;
>
> -      if (!AppendBitField(*Field, Layout.getFieldOffset(FieldNo),
> -                          ILE->getInit(ElementNo)))
> +    // Get the initializer.  A struct can include fields without 
> initializers,
> +    // we just use explicit null values for them.
> +    llvm::Constant *EltInit;
> +    if (ElementNo < ILE->getNumInits())
> +      EltInit = CGM.EmitConstantExpr(ILE->getInit(ElementNo++),
> +                                     Field->getType(), CGF);
> +    else
> +      EltInit = CGM.EmitNullConstant(Field->getType());
> +
> +    if (!Field->isBitField()) {
> +      // Handle non-bitfield members.
> +      if (!AppendField(*Field, Layout.getFieldOffset(FieldNo), EltInit))
>         return false;
>     } else {
> -      if (!AppendField(*Field, Layout.getFieldOffset(FieldNo),
> -                       ILE->getInit(ElementNo)))
> +      // Otherwise we have a bitfield.
> +      if (!AppendBitField(*Field, Layout.getFieldOffset(FieldNo), 
> EltInit))
>         return false;
>     }
> -
> -    ElementNo++;
>   }
>
>   uint64_t LayoutSizeInBytes = Layout.getSize() / 8;
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/decl.c
> URL: 
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/decl.c?rev=101155&r1=101154&r2=101155&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/decl.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/decl.c Tue Apr 13 13:16:19 2010
> @@ -5,7 +5,10 @@
> // CHECK: @test5w = global %0 { i32 2, [4 x i8] zeroinitializer }
> // CHECK: @test5y = global %union.test5u { double 7.300000e+0{{[0]*}}1 }
>
> -// CHECK: @test6.x = internal constant %1 { i8 1, i8 2, i32 3, [4 x i8] 
> zeroinitializer }
> +// CHECK: @test6.x = internal constant %struct.SelectDest { i8 1, i8 2, 
> i32 3, i32 0 }
> +
> +// CHECK: @test7 = global [2 x %struct.test7s] [%struct.test7s { i32 1, 
> i32 2 }, %struct.test7s { i32 4, i32 0 }]
> +
> void test1() {
>   // This should codegen as a "@test1.x" global.
>   const int x[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 123, 231, 123,23 };
> @@ -74,3 +77,10 @@
>   struct SelectDest x = {1, 2, 3};
>   test6f(&x);
> }
> +
> +// rdar://7657600
> +struct test7s { int a; int b; } test7[] = {
> +  {1, 2},
> +  {4},
> +};
> +
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits 




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list