[cfe-commits] r85405 - /cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html

[Sebastian Redl]

Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
> Author: fjahanian
> Date: Wed Oct 28 12:25:01 2009
> New Revision: 85405
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=85405&view=rev
> Log:
> Removed a Note related to pointer to member functions which
> does not seem to exist any longer.
>   
Yes it does. See the last FIXME in CheckPointerToMemberOperands in 
SemaExprCXX.cpp.
It's not a big issue, since there is no grammatically correct way to use 
this expression, but the issue exists - if the compiler were to accept 
this, the assertion would hold under our implementation:

struct S { void f(); };
void g();
S s;
void (S::*pf)() = &S::f;
static_assert(same_type<decltype(g), decltype(s.*pf)>::value);

Sebastian