[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] d54528: Enable MemorySSA
Florian Hahn via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 13 05:15:23 PDT 2020
Branch: refs/heads/perf/dse-mssa
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: d545286b861cc6c460e36543ffd2771166847fa0
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d545286b861cc6c460e36543ffd2771166847fa0
Author: Florian Hahn <flo at fhahn.com>
Date: 2020-08-13 (Thu, 13 Aug 2020)
Changed paths:
M llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp
Log Message:
-----------
Enable MemorySSA
Commit: 9e46fcc34c01386e5142e1630ad02e1284c49c67
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9e46fcc34c01386e5142e1630ad02e1284c49c67
Author: Florian Hahn <flo at fhahn.com>
Date: 2020-08-13 (Thu, 13 Aug 2020)
Changed paths:
M llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp
Log Message:
-----------
[DSE,MSSA] Cache accesses with/without reachable read-clobbers.
Summary:
Currently we repeatedly check the same uses for read clobbers in some
cases. We can avoid unnecessary checks by keeping track of the memory
accesses we already found read clobbers for. To do so, we just add
memory access causing read-clobbers to a set. Note that marking all
visited accesses as read-clobbers would be to pessimistic, as that might
include accesses not on any path to the actual read clobber.
If we do not find any read-clobbers, we can add all visited instructions
to another set and use that to skip the same accesses in the next call.
I did not yet measure compile-time, but below is the impact on the
number of iterations in getDomMemoryDef:
Metric: dse.NumDomMemDefChecks
Program base patch diff
test-suite...000/183.equake/183.equake.test 132580.00 26961.00 -79.7%
test-suite...T95/147.vortex/147.vortex.test 881946.00 297521.00 -66.3%
test-suite...000/255.vortex/255.vortex.test 882090.00 297594.00 -66.3%
test-suite...T2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk.test 700940.00 247624.00 -64.7%
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 990956.00 357584.00 -63.9%
test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test 23014.00 8364.00 -63.7%
test-suite...marks/SciMark2-C/scimark2.test 20939.00 8230.00 -60.7%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test 2412386.00 951674.00 -60.6%
test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 1850445.00 796042.00 -57.0%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 1735262.00 753271.00 -56.6%
test-suite...ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CLAMR.test 393888.00 172514.00 -56.2%
test-suite...ProxyApps-C++/HPCCG/HPCCG.test 42350.00 18931.00 -55.3%
test-suite...000/186.crafty/186.crafty.test 371608.00 167669.00 -54.9%
test-suite...langs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl.test 10263.00 4763.00 -53.6%
test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test 1641688.00 763696.00 -53.5%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 1459213.00 679907.00 -53.4%
test-suite...FreeBench/distray/distray.test 10477.00 5113.00 -51.2%
test-suite.../Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5.test 2651.00 1295.00 -51.2%
test-suite...s/Rodinia/hotspot/hotspot.test 4031.00 1989.00 -50.7%
test-suite...T2006/401.bzip2/401.bzip2.test 171479.00 85496.00 -50.1%
test-suite...lowfish/security-blowfish.test 6217.00 3143.00 -49.4%
test-suite...rks/FreeBench/mason/mason.test 1386.00 712.00 -48.6%
test-suite...yApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT.test 135316.00 71201.00 -47.4%
test-suite...ks/McCat/04-bisect/bisect.test 3353.00 1801.00 -46.3%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 1500143.00 810226.00 -46.0%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 1278779.00 711387.00 -44.4%
test-suite...lications/viterbi/viterbi.test 11564.00 6497.00 -43.8%
test-suite...plications/d/make_dparser.test 54338.00 31158.00 -42.7%
test-suite...ternal/HMMER/hmmcalibrate.test 75317.00 43258.00 -42.6%
test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test 447833.00 258126.00 -42.4%
test-suite...lications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4.test 32896.00 19381.00 -41.1%
test-suite...6/482.sphinx3/482.sphinx3.test 62177.00 37137.00 -40.3%
test-suite...nia/pathfinder/pathfinder.test 1322.00 795.00 -39.9%
test-suite...math/automotive-basicmath.test 146.00 88.00 -39.7%
test-suite...ngs-C/simulator/simulator.test 18187.00 10982.00 -39.6%
test-suite...s/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk.test 3040.00 1839.00 -39.5%
test-suite...T2006/473.astar/473.astar.test 37795.00 22910.00 -39.4%
test-suite...CFP2006/444.namd/444.namd.test 97627.00 59229.00 -39.3%
test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 802759.00 488393.00 -39.2%
test-suite...T2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer.test 96748.00 58957.00 -39.1%
test-suite...quoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk.test 9157.00 5669.00 -38.1%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst.test 1054.00 653.00 -38.0%
test-suite :: External/Nurbs/nurbs.test 14763.00 9177.00 -37.8%
test-suite...CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp.test 84072.00 53009.00 -36.9%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test 98221.00 61993.00 -36.9%
test-suite...rks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.test 15560.00 9888.00 -36.5%
test-suite...ks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort.test 497.00 323.00 -35.0%
test-suite...INT2000/164.gzip/164.gzip.test 30328.00 19767.00 -34.8%
test-suite...lications/obsequi/Obsequi.test 44239.00 29195.00 -34.0%
test-suite.../CINT2000/252.eon/252.eon.test 340333.00 224748.00 -34.0%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C++/trees/trees.test 2573.00 1715.00 -33.3%
test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 190315.00 126890.00 -33.3%
test-suite...nch/fourinarow/fourinarow.test 1487.00 994.00 -33.2%
test-suite...SPEC/CINT95/099.go/099.go.test 256287.00 173249.00 -32.4%
test-suite...s-C/Pathfinder/PathFinder.test 8366.00 5708.00 -31.8%
test-suite...5/124.m88ksim/124.m88ksim.test 62116.00 42425.00 -31.7%
test-suite...arks/McCat/17-bintr/bintr.test 154.00 107.00 -30.5%
test-suite...langs-C/football/football.test 17864.00 12416.00 -30.5%
test-suite...lications/minisat/minisat.test 9504.00 6676.00 -29.8%
test-suite...rks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 1275472.00 896318.00 -29.7%
test-suite...s/FreeBench/neural/neural.test 1534.00 1087.00 -29.1%
test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 259748.00 185421.00 -28.6%
test-suite...comm-adpcm/telecomm-adpcm.test 53.00 38.00 -28.3%
test-suite...adpcm/rawdaudio/rawdaudio.test 53.00 38.00 -28.3%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/Olden/tsp/tsp.test 2522.00 1834.00 -27.3%
test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test 650268.00 476041.00 -26.8%
In some cases this also increase the number of eliminated stores,
because we can explore further. Note that there is a small regression
which I should track down.
Metric: dse.NumFastStores
Program base patch diff
test-suite...T2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk.test 82.00 123.00 50.0%
test-suite...C/CFP2000/179.art/179.art.test 6.00 7.00 16.7%
test-suite...math/automotive-basicmath.test 7.00 8.00 14.3%
test-suite...ngs-C/assembler/assembler.test 8.00 9.00 12.5%
test-suite...ks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.test 9.00 10.00 11.1%
test-suite...INT95/132.ijpeg/132.ijpeg.test 18.00 20.00 11.1%
test-suite...langs-C/football/football.test 10.00 11.00 10.0%
test-suite...ce/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh.test 13.00 14.00 7.7%
test-suite...ications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 382.00 402.00 5.2%
test-suite...000/183.equake/183.equake.test 40.00 38.00 -5.0%
test-suite...6/482.sphinx3/482.sphinx3.test 22.00 23.00 4.5%
test-suite...T95/147.vortex/147.vortex.test 215.00 224.00 4.2%
test-suite...000/255.vortex/255.vortex.test 217.00 226.00 4.1%
test-suite...SPEC/CINT95/099.go/099.go.test 63.00 65.00 3.2%
test-suite.../Benchmarks/nbench/nbench.test 76.00 78.00 2.6%
test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 153.00 157.00 2.6%
test-suite...INT2000/164.gzip/164.gzip.test 39.00 40.00 2.6%
test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 840.00 854.00 1.7%
test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 1211.00 1231.00 1.7%
test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 730.00 741.00 1.5%
test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test 1417.00 1437.00 1.4%
test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test 230.00 233.00 1.3%
test-suite.../Applications/SPASS/SPASS.test 156.00 158.00 1.3%
test-suite...0.perlbench/400.perlbench.test 861.00 871.00 1.2%
test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test 879.00 889.00 1.1%
test-suite...nsumer-lame/consumer-lame.test 100.00 101.00 1.0%
test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test 1220.00 1231.00 0.9%
test-suite...ocBench/espresso/espresso.test 115.00 116.00 0.9%
test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test 116.00 117.00 0.9%
test-suite...5/124.m88ksim/124.m88ksim.test 116.00 117.00 0.9%
test-suite...CI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.test 158.00 159.00 0.6%
test-suite...000/186.crafty/186.crafty.test 158.00 159.00 0.6%
test-suite...0/253.perlbmk/253.perlbmk.test 500.00 503.00 0.6%
test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test 1178.00 1185.00 0.6%
test-suite...CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp.test 181.00 182.00 0.6%
test-suite.../CINT2000/252.eon/252.eon.test 2672.00 2685.00 0.5%
test-suite...006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 2117.00 2127.00 0.5%
test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 1047.00 1051.00 0.4%
test-suite...rks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 814.00 816.00 0.2%
test-suite...3.xalancbmk/483.xalancbmk.test 1265.00 1267.00 0.2%
test-suite.../Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc.test 11.00 11.00 0.0%
Reviewers: dmgreen, rnk, efriedma, bryant, asbirlea
Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75025
Compare: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/d545286b861c%5E...9e46fcc34c01
More information about the All-commits
mailing list